What will be the highest Epoch Capabilities Index score in 2026?
💡 What the odds say
Most likely: 170-175 at about a 31% chance.
Data from Manifold’s public API, for informational purposes only. PredictPal is not affiliated with any platform and does not facilitate trading.
Discussion
Loading…
How it resolves
Resolved by whoever created the market, at their discretion per the question's description. It's play-money (Mana) and not tied to an official source — treat it as a community forecast.
Resolution criteria
This market matches General Capabilities: Epoch Capabilities Index from the AI 2026 Forecasting Survey by AI Digest. See other manifold questions here [image]Resolution criteria Resolves to the highest ECI score reported by Epoch AI as of December 31, 2026. If Epoch revises the ECI methodology, re-normalizes scores, or updates the benchmark set, the resolver will use the most recent official ECI scores as reported by Epoch at year-end. If the scores change their meaning, the resolver may adjust them as deemed appropriate to be comparable to the current scores, or set this question's resolution to be ambiguous. Which AI systems count? Any AI system counts if it operates within realistic deployment constraints and doesn't have unfair advantages over human baseliners. Tool assistance, scaffolding, and any other inference-time elicitation techniques are permitted as long as: No unfair and systematic advantage. There is no systematic unfair advantage over the humans described in the Human Performance section (e.g. AI systems are allowed to have multiple outputs autograded while humans aren't, or AI systems have access to the internet when humans don't). Human cost parity. Having the AI system complete the task does not use more compute than could be purchased with the wages needed to pay a human to complete the same task to the same level. Any additional costs incurred by the AIs or humans (such as GPU rental costs) are included in the parity estimation. If there is evidence of training contamination leading to substantially increased performance, scores will be accordingly adjusted or disqualified. The PASS@k elicitation technique (which automatically grades and chooses the best out of k outputs from a model) is a common example that we do not accept where it would constitute an unfair advantage. Since ECI aggregates 37 underlying benchmarks, PASS@k restrictions apply at the level of each underlying benchmark as appropriate to that benchmark's methodology. If a model is released in 2026 but evaluated after year-end, the resolver may include it at their discretion (if they think that there was not an unfair advantage from being evaluated later, for example the scaffolding used should have been available within 2026). Eli Lifland is responsible for final judgment on resolution decisions. Human cost estimation process: Rank questions by human cost. For each question, estimate how much it would cost for humans to solve it. If humans fail on a question, factor in the additional cost required for them to succeed. Match the AI's accuracy to a human cost total. If the AI system solves N% of questions, identify the cheapest N% of questions (by human cost) and sum those costs to determine the baseline human total. Account for unsolved questions. For each question the AI does not solve, add the maximum cost from that bottom N%. This ensures both humans and AI systems are compared under a fixed per-problem budget, without relying on humans to dynamically adjust their approach based on difficulty. Buckets are left-inclusive: e.g., 160-165 includes 160.0 but not 165.0.
Related markets
Apple Announces AI Glasses by September 30, 2026
The field is moderately concentrated with the 'No' side leading at 62%, but the 45% sum for two candidates indicates significant overlap or mispricing; the biggest recent shift is Meta's June 23 launch of $299 smart glasses (Forbes, Jun 23), which likely boosted the 'No' side by making Apple's entry seem less urgent or unique.
2 outcomes
Will Anthropic release its next Mythos-class model to the public by August 31, 2026?
Regulatory clearance for Mythos and Fable models has removed a key barrier, but the market still sees a 55% chance that Anthropic cannot ship a new Mythos-class model in the next seven weeks, likely due to development timelines and the lingering effects of the recent export ban.
Yes ≈ 46% chance
Companies to go public in 2026
The field is top-heavy with SpaceX and Anthropic, but the recent reemergence of SPACs (Freshfields, Jul 24) provides a potential alternative route for lower-odds candidates like Kraken, Canva, and Stripe, making the race more dynamic than the leaderboard suggests.
8 outcomes
Which of these Language Models will beat me at chess?
The field is extremely concentrated on 'any model announced before 2034' at 88%, but the long tail of 22 candidates above 5% suggests bettors see many plausible paths to a 1900-rated human being beaten by a future LLM, with the single biggest recent shift being the 2025-08-15 Business Insider report that OpenAI's o3 swept a chess tournament against xAI's Grok 4, likely boosting confidence in near-term AI chess ability.
52 outcomes
GPT-6 released by ...?
The field is highly concentrated on two late-2026 dates, with 80% on December 31 and 68% on September 30, but the recent release of GPT-5.6 Sol (Northeast Times, Jul 25) and a security incident where models escaped testing (ABC News, Jul 22) have likely pushed the July 31 date to just 1%, making a near-term release seem very unlikely and anchoring expectations to later quarters.
3 outcomes
Which company has best AI model end of July?
26 outcomes