Will AI wipe out humanity before the year 2100
💡 What the odds say
The market puts this at about a 13% chance — very unlikely.
No money — just record your call and see if you were right. Yes is at 13% right now.
Despite high-profile warnings from AI leaders, the market remains heavily skeptical (13% Yes) that AI will cause human extinction by 2100, reflecting a belief that current AI capabilities are far from existential threat and that safety measures will keep pace.
What's driving it
- • The lack of any recent catastrophic AI incident or breakthrough that dramatically increases existential risk keeps the odds low; the most recent headlines about human extinction (June 2026) concern ancient plagues and supervolcanoes, not AI (SciTechDaily, ScienceDaily).
- • Prominent warnings, such as the 'Godfather of AI' shortening odds of AI wiping out humanity (The Guardian, Dec 2024) and a prediction of three years until AI could wipe us out (The Australian, Nov 2025), have not shifted the market significantly, suggesting these are seen as alarmist.
- • Axios reported a top AI CEO foreseeing a 'white-collar bloodbath' (May 2025), which implies job displacement rather than extinction, possibly reinforcing the view that AI's near-term risks are economic, not existential.
The case for YES
- • Leading AI researchers, including the 'Godfather of AI' Geoffrey Hinton, have publicly shortened their odds of AI causing human extinction within 30 years (The Guardian, Dec 2024), lending credibility to the existential risk scenario.
- • The Australian opinion piece (Nov 2025) warns that we have only three years until AI could wipe us out, citing rapid advances in autonomous systems and lack of regulation.
- • If AI systems achieve general intelligence and are deployed without robust safety guarantees, the risk of catastrophic outcomes increases, as argued by many AI safety advocates.
The case for NO
- • Historical examples of existential threats, such as supervolcanoes (ScienceDaily, May 2025) and plagues (SciTechDaily, June 2026), show humanity has survived extreme events, suggesting resilience against even severe AI risks.
- • Current AI systems remain narrow and far from human-level general intelligence, with no demonstrated capability to cause global extinction; the 'white-collar bloodbath' forecast (Axios, May 2025) points to economic disruption, not annihilation.
- • Global efforts in AI safety research and governance are expanding, reducing the likelihood of an uncontrolled AI takeover before 2100.
What to watch
- • No dated upcoming events are provided in the headlines; however, a future announcement of a general AI system or a catastrophic AI failure would likely increase Yes odds, while a binding international AI safety agreement would decrease them.
AI-generated · grounded in recent news + odds · informational only, not advice. Verify on the source platform.
Data from Manifold’s public API, for informational purposes only. PredictPal is not affiliated with any platform and does not facilitate trading.
Discussion
Loading…
How it resolves
Resolved by whoever created the market, at their discretion per the question's description. It's play-money (Mana) and not tied to an official source — treat it as a community forecast.
ⓘ A market settles under its own written rules, which can lag what looks decided in the news — so the price may not move to 100% the moment an outcome seems obvious.
View the official rules on Manifold ↗Related markets
How Much Will Discord Be Worth on Day 1?
The field is highly fragmented with three roughly equal candidates, but the most notable recent shift is the emergence of a 'Less than $20B' option at 40%, likely reflecting skepticism about Discord's ability to command a premium valuation after a travel-focused article (Mshale, Jul 12) highlighted a service outage, undermining confidence in its reliability and growth narrative.
3 outcomes
Apple Announces AI Glasses by September 30, 2026
The field is moderately concentrated with the 'No' side leading at 62%, but the 45% sum for two candidates indicates significant overlap or mispricing; the biggest recent shift is Meta's June 23 launch of $299 smart glasses (Forbes, Jun 23), which likely boosted the 'No' side by making Apple's entry seem less urgent or unique.
2 outcomes
Which of these Language Models will beat me at chess?
The field is extremely concentrated on 'any model announced before 2034' at 88%, but the long tail of 22 candidates above 5% suggests bettors see many plausible paths to a 1900-rated human being beaten by a future LLM, with the single biggest recent shift being the 2025-08-15 Business Insider report that OpenAI's o3 swept a chess tournament against xAI's Grok 4, likely boosting confidence in near-term AI chess ability.
52 outcomes
Will Anthropic release its next Mythos-class model to the public by August 31, 2026?
Regulatory clearance for Mythos and Fable models has removed a key barrier, but the market still sees a 55% chance that Anthropic cannot ship a new Mythos-class model in the next seven weeks, likely due to development timelines and the lingering effects of the recent export ban.
Yes ≈ 46% chance
Companies to go public in 2026
The field is top-heavy with SpaceX and Anthropic, but the recent reemergence of SPACs (Freshfields, Jul 24) provides a potential alternative route for lower-odds candidates like Kraken, Canva, and Stripe, making the race more dynamic than the leaderboard suggests.
8 outcomes