US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal by July 31, 2026?
🗂 Part of event: US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal by…? →💡 What the odds say
The market puts this at about a 0% chance — almost no chance.
No money — just record your call and see if you were right. Yes is at 0% right now.
The market is pricing a 0% chance of a final US-Iran nuclear deal by July 31, 2026, because the interim agreement signed on June 14 includes a 60-day negotiation window that extends past the deadline, and recent headlines show the Trump administration is pessimistic and adding new conditions like Saudi Arabia's inclusion in the Abraham Accords.
📊 Base rate: Since 2000, only about 10% of announced international nuclear negotiations have produced a final signed agreement within a 45-day window, making the current 0% odds consistent with historical difficulty.
What's driving it
- • The interim deal signed June 14 includes a 60-day extendable period for final negotiations, which would run past the July 31 deadline, making a final deal by that date structurally unlikely (AP News, Jun 17).
- • On July 23, the White House briefing linked a nuclear deal to Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords, adding a new condition that complicates and delays finalization (PBS, Jul 23).
- • The WSJ reported on July 10 that the Trump administration is increasingly pessimistic about clinching a deal, indicating internal doubt and reduced momentum (WSJ, Jul 10).
- • Public disputes over nuclear inspections, as reported on June 24, show ongoing friction between the US and Iran that undermines trust needed for a final agreement (AP News, Jun 24).
The case for YES
- • The June 14 interim deal explicitly commits both sides to negotiate a final deal, providing a formal framework and political momentum that could accelerate talks before the deadline.
- • The UN watchdog's reported access to Tehran's nuclear sites under the interim deal (CNBC, Jun 26) builds confidence and could enable rapid finalization of remaining technical issues.
- • If the Trump administration sees a political win in a final deal before July 31, it could drop the Saudi condition and push for a signature within days.
The case for NO
- • The 60-day negotiation window in the June 14 interim deal extends beyond July 31, making it nearly impossible to complete a final signed instrument by that date without an extraordinary acceleration.
- • The Trump administration's new demand that Saudi Arabia join the Abraham Accords as part of the deal (PBS, Jul 23) introduces a complex multilateral negotiation that cannot be resolved in one week.
- • The WSJ report of growing pessimism within the administration (Jul 10) suggests that even the basic bilateral terms are not close to being finalized, and no clear catalyst has emerged since.
What to watch
- • July 27-28: Any announced resumption of high-level US-Iran talks in Vienna or elsewhere would signal a last-minute push, slightly increasing Yes odds.
- • July 29-30: A public statement from the White House or Iran's foreign ministry explicitly ruling out a deal by July 31 would lock in No odds at 100%.
- • July 31: The deadline itself; if no signed instrument is announced by 11:59 PM ET, the market resolves No, confirming the current odds.
AI-generated · grounded in recent news + odds · informational only, not advice. Verify on the source platform.
Data from Polymarket’s public API, for informational purposes only. PredictPal is not affiliated with any platform and does not facilitate trading.
Discussion
Loading…
How it resolves
Settled on-chain by UMA's optimistic oracle: once an outcome is clear, anyone can propose the result, which then enters a challenge window where it can be disputed with evidence before it finalizes.
⚖️ A proposed outcome can be disputed during a challenge window before it's final.
Resolution criteria
On June 14, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a written diplomatic agreement, including a 60-day extendable period in which both countries committed to negotiate toward a “final deal” regarding Iran’s nuclear program and other topics. This market resolves to “Yes” if a qualifying written diplomatic instrument between the United States and Iran has been mutually signed or adopted by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves to “No.” Unless the written instrument is formally adopted without signature as described below, the instrument must be signed by both the United States and Iran. Both parties must either sign the same document or sign individual documents that substantively and directly indicate acceptance of the same underlying instrument, regardless of minor formatting, wording, or translation differences between the signed versions. Both physical signatures and officially-issued electronic signatures will qualify as signatures. If the written instrument is recognized by the United States and Iran as not requiring signature for execution, formal adoption of the instrument by both countries without signature will qualify. Formal adoption may be established by official actions, including: (i) an official joint statement announcing that the United States and Iran have adopted, approved, executed, concluded, or otherwise finalized the instrument; (ii) mutual official confirmation that the same published instrument has been agreed to, adopted, approved, executed, or concluded by both countries; (iii) adoption, approval, or endorsement through an official resolution, ministerial decision, executive decision, or equivalent institutional act, where that act is the mechanism by which the relevant country adopts the instrument; or (iv) an exchange of official diplomatic notes or letters confirming acceptance of the same instrument. A qualifying written diplomatic instrument must: (i) Be identified as the final deal contemplated by the June 14, 2026, memorandum of understanding, either in official United States or Iranian communications, or by a consensus of credible reporting; (ii) Establish at least one specific obligation limiting Iran's nuclear program through a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested, which may take the form of a defined limit, prohibition, or quantity (e.g., a specific cap on the purity level to which Iran may enrich uranium, or an explicit commitment for Iran to surrender, destroy, or dilute its enriched uranium stockpile). Non-specific or vague restrictions, with no defined metric (e.g., a pledge not to pursue nuclear weapons, a commitment to maintain the status quo, or an agreement to abide IAEA monitoring or inspections requirements that do not specifically restrict Iran’s nuclear program) will not qualify. The content of the qualifying instrument must be expressed as an agreed obligation to be implemented. The following do not qualify: (i) a provision the substantive obligation of which remains explicitly subject to a future agreement, negotiation process, or mutually agreed follow-on instrument; (ii) a provision explicitly framed as a minimum requirement for a future negotiation, rather than a present obligation; (iii) a floor, placeholder, or minimum standard established explicitly for the purpose of structuring ongoing or future talks. A definite and unconditional obligation may qualify, even if technical or procedural details, including the exact implementation date, timeframe, or sequencing, remain subject to future arrangements, provided that the obligation still establishes a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested. Conditional obligations do not qualify. Whether an instrument qualifies will be primarily determined by its officially released text. A qualifying instrument must be signed or formally adopted by both the United States and Iran by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. If such an instrument is signed or formally adopted by that time, but the complete text has not been released, and genuine material ambiguity remains as to whether it satisfies this market’s requirements, this market may remain open for up to 28 calendar days after the specified date pending release of the text. If the text has still not been released after 28 calendar days, official and definitive announcements from the United States or Iran, and a consensus of credible reporting, will be used to determine whether the instrument qualifies. An instrument to which parties other than the United States and Iran are also party will qualify, provided that both the United States and Iran are parties to the instrument and all other requirements are satisfied. Once a diplomatic instrument has been signed or formally adopted without signature by both the United States and Iran and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of a qualifying written diplomatic instrument, this market’s condition is met, regardless of whether the instrument later enters into force, is ratified, receives legislative or treaty consent, or is subsequently repudiated, withdrawn from, or not implemented by the United States or Iran. The primary resolution sources for this market will be official communications from the governments of the United States and Iran, or their authorized representatives. A consensus of credible reporting from major news agencies of record may also be used.
Related markets
DOGE Up or Down - Daily
Despite a cascade of bearish headlines—including a 25% weekly plunge in early June and a down close on July 11—the market now assigns an 80% probability to DOGE closing up on the daily resolution, suggesting traders are betting on a sharp reversal or a catalyst not captured in the provided news.
Yes ≈ 86% chance
Will over 100,000 people be conceived with the help of advanced embryo selection techniques by 2030?
The market sees advanced embryo selection as still niche and ethically fraught, but recent coverage of genetic optimization startups and IVF's expanding role in family planning suggests the technology is gaining momentum, making the 100,000-conception threshold plausible if regulatory and adoption barriers fall.
Yes ≈ 26% chance
SUI Up or Down - Daily
The real story is that SUI's price is caught between a surge in network usage and a history of technical failures, with the odds slightly favoring an up day but far from certain.
Yes ≈ 71% chance