US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal by August 13, 2026?
🗂 Part of event: US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal by…? →💡 What the odds say
The market puts this at about a 2% chance — almost no chance.
No money — just record your call and see if you were right. Yes is at 2% right now.
The market heavily discounts a final nuclear deal by August 13, 2026, because the June 14 interim agreement only set a 60-day negotiation window, and recent headlines show the Trump administration is pessimistic and has added a new condition requiring Saudi Arabia to join the Abraham Accords, making a signed final instrument by the deadline highly unlikely.
📊 Base rate: Since the 2015 JCPOA, no comprehensive US-Iran nuclear deal has been finalized within a 60-day negotiation period, and interim agreements have historically failed to produce a final signed deal within such short windows.
What's driving it
- • The Trump administration's growing pessimism about clinching a deal, reported by WSJ on July 10, directly undermines the likelihood of a final agreement by the deadline.
- • Trump's new condition that a nuclear deal requires Saudi Arabia to join the Abraham Accords, stated at a White House briefing on July 23, adds a complex geopolitical hurdle that was not part of the June 14 interim agreement.
- • Public disputes over nuclear inspections, highlighted by AP News on June 24, indicate ongoing fundamental disagreements that make a final signed instrument within weeks improbable.
The case for YES
- • The June 14 interim agreement explicitly commits both sides to negotiate a 'final deal' within a 60-day extendable period, providing a structured pathway and mutual intent that could culminate in a signed instrument by August 13.
- • The UN watchdog's reported access to Tehran's nuclear sites, per CNBC on June 26, shows tangible progress on a key sticking point, potentially building enough trust for a final deal.
- • The market odds at 2% are extremely low, and a surprise breakthrough—such as a last-minute signing at a summit—could still occur, as the deadline is only about two weeks away.
The case for NO
- • The Trump administration's explicit pessimism, as reported by WSJ on July 10, signals that internal U.S. assessments see a deal as unlikely, reducing the probability of a final push.
- • Trump's linkage of the nuclear deal to Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords, announced on July 23, introduces a new, time-consuming condition that cannot realistically be resolved by August 13.
- • The public negotiation over inspections, reported by AP News on June 24, shows unresolved technical and political disputes that typically prevent a final signed agreement within a short timeframe.
What to watch
- • Any official statement from the White House or State Department in the next two weeks indicating a breakthrough or collapse in talks would move the odds sharply; a positive statement would increase Yes odds, while a negative one would cement No.
- • A scheduled meeting between US and Iranian negotiators before August 13, if announced, could raise Yes odds; cancellation would lower them.
- • A public statement from Saudi Arabia on joining the Abraham Accords, either accepting or rejecting Trump's condition, would directly impact the deal's feasibility; acceptance could boost Yes odds, rejection would lower them.
AI-generated · grounded in recent news + odds · informational only, not advice. Verify on the source platform.
Data from Polymarket’s public API, for informational purposes only. PredictPal is not affiliated with any platform and does not facilitate trading.
Discussion
Loading…
How it resolves
Settled on-chain by UMA's optimistic oracle: once an outcome is clear, anyone can propose the result, which then enters a challenge window where it can be disputed with evidence before it finalizes.
⚖️ A proposed outcome can be disputed during a challenge window before it's final.
Resolution criteria
On June 14, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a written diplomatic agreement, including a 60-day extendable period in which both countries committed to negotiate toward a “final deal” regarding Iran’s nuclear program and other topics. This market resolves to “Yes” if a qualifying written diplomatic instrument between the United States and Iran has been mutually signed or adopted by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves to “No.” Unless the written instrument is formally adopted without signature as described below, the instrument must be signed by both the United States and Iran. Both parties must either sign the same document or sign individual documents that substantively and directly indicate acceptance of the same underlying instrument, regardless of minor formatting, wording, or translation differences between the signed versions. Both physical signatures and officially-issued electronic signatures will qualify as signatures. If the written instrument is recognized by the United States and Iran as not requiring signature for execution, formal adoption of the instrument by both countries without signature will qualify. Formal adoption may be established by official actions, including: (i) an official joint statement announcing that the United States and Iran have adopted, approved, executed, concluded, or otherwise finalized the instrument; (ii) mutual official confirmation that the same published instrument has been agreed to, adopted, approved, executed, or concluded by both countries; (iii) adoption, approval, or endorsement through an official resolution, ministerial decision, executive decision, or equivalent institutional act, where that act is the mechanism by which the relevant country adopts the instrument; or (iv) an exchange of official diplomatic notes or letters confirming acceptance of the same instrument. A qualifying written diplomatic instrument must: (i) Be identified as the final deal contemplated by the June 14, 2026, memorandum of understanding, either in official United States or Iranian communications, or by a consensus of credible reporting; (ii) Establish at least one specific obligation limiting Iran's nuclear program through a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested, which may take the form of a defined limit, prohibition, or quantity (e.g., a specific cap on the purity level to which Iran may enrich uranium, or an explicit commitment for Iran to surrender, destroy, or dilute its enriched uranium stockpile). Non-specific or vague restrictions, with no defined metric (e.g., a pledge not to pursue nuclear weapons, a commitment to maintain the status quo, or an agreement to abide IAEA monitoring or inspections requirements that do not specifically restrict Iran’s nuclear program) will not qualify. The content of the qualifying instrument must be expressed as an agreed obligation to be implemented. The following do not qualify: (i) a provision the substantive obligation of which remains explicitly subject to a future agreement, negotiation process, or mutually agreed follow-on instrument; (ii) a provision explicitly framed as a minimum requirement for a future negotiation, rather than a present obligation; (iii) a floor, placeholder, or minimum standard established explicitly for the purpose of structuring ongoing or future talks. A definite and unconditional obligation may qualify, even if technical or procedural details, including the exact implementation date, timeframe, or sequencing, remain subject to future arrangements, provided that the obligation still establishes a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested. Conditional obligations do not qualify. Whether an instrument qualifies will be primarily determined by its officially released text. A qualifying instrument must be signed or formally adopted by both the United States and Iran by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. If such an instrument is signed or formally adopted by that time, but the complete text has not been released, and genuine material ambiguity remains as to whether it satisfies this market’s requirements, this market may remain open for up to 28 calendar days after the specified date pending release of the text. If the text has still not been released after 28 calendar days, official and definitive announcements from the United States or Iran, and a consensus of credible reporting, will be used to determine whether the instrument qualifies. An instrument to which parties other than the United States and Iran are also party will qualify, provided that both the United States and Iran are parties to the instrument and all other requirements are satisfied. Once a diplomatic instrument has been signed or formally adopted without signature by both the United States and Iran and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of a qualifying written diplomatic instrument, this market’s condition is met, regardless of whether the instrument later enters into force, is ratified, receives legislative or treaty consent, or is subsequently repudiated, withdrawn from, or not implemented by the United States or Iran. The primary resolution sources for this market will be official communications from the governments of the United States and Iran, or their authorized representatives. A consensus of credible reporting from major news agencies of record may also be used.
Related markets
DOGE Up or Down - Daily
Despite a cascade of bearish headlines—including a 25% weekly plunge in early June and a down close on July 11—the market now assigns an 80% probability to DOGE closing up on the daily resolution, suggesting traders are betting on a sharp reversal or a catalyst not captured in the provided news.
Yes ≈ 80% chance
Los Angeles Daily Temperature High (81)
The market prices just a 2% chance that Los Angeles saw exactly 81°F on July 25, 2026—a reflection of both the inherent rarity of any specific integer temperature and the context of an unusually hot spring that tilted the distribution upward.
Yes ≈ 2% chance
Will over 100,000 people be conceived with the help of advanced embryo selection techniques by 2030?
The market sees advanced embryo selection as still niche and ethically fraught, but recent coverage of genetic optimization startups and IVF's expanding role in family planning suggests the technology is gaining momentum, making the 100,000-conception threshold plausible if regulatory and adoption barriers fall.
Yes ≈ 26% chance
Los Angeles Daily Temperature High (81)
The contract for LAX on July 25, 2026, has effectively already resolved to No, with odds at 2% reflecting the observed high temperature below 81°F. The earlier heatwave headlines (March–April) do not directly explain this outcome, as the specific day did not meet the threshold.
Yes ≈ 2% chance
Los Angeles Daily Temperature High (81)
This market is effectively resolved: the event date (July 25, 2026) has passed, and the overwhelming 98% No odds indicate that actual temperature readings have already shown the high was not exactly 81°F, with final confirmation likely the only remaining step.
Yes ≈ 2% chance
SUI Up or Down - Daily
The market is pricing a 71% chance SUI ends the day up, driven by a recent price hold above $0.70 and surging transaction volume, but this optimism ignores two major network outages in recent months that could undermine confidence at any moment.
Yes ≈ 59% chance